The Orange Economy: An Infinite Opportunity (2013)

View PDF

This Inter-American Development Bank publication by Felipe Buitrago Restrepo and Iván Duque Márquez introduces the "Orange Economy" as their term for the creative economy. They define it as "the group of linked activities through which ideas are transformed into cultural goods and services whose value is determined by intellectual property." The authors chose "orange" because the color has historically been associated with creativity, culture, and transformation across various civilizations.

The Orange Economy encompasses three main components: the Cultural Economy (traditional artistic activities and heritage preservation), Creative Industries (combining conventional cultural industries with functional creations and new media), and creativity-supporting activities (research, education, governance, and intellectual property rights).

The Americas Context

For the Americas specifically, the study reveals that the Orange Economy contributes $1.93 trillion to regional output, with the United States dominating at $1.66 trillion. Latin America and the Caribbean collectively contribute $175 billion, supporting approximately 11.5 million jobs. However, the region faces a significant trade deficit in creative goods and services, which nearly doubles when intellectual property payments are included.

The authors identify seven major markets in Latin America and the Caribbean: Brazil ($66.87 billion), Mexico ($55.01 billion), Argentina ($17.08 billion), Colombia ($11.00 billion), Venezuela ($5.06 billion), Peru ($4.72 billion), and Chile ($3.98 billion). Despite this substantial economic activity, the region's creative industries remain fragmented and underutilized.

Challenges and Invisible Potential

The document addresses why the Orange Economy remains "invisible" to most policymakers and economists. Seven key challenges are identified: complex definitions spanning culture, creativity, and economics; non-obvious relationships between culture and economic development; recent development of quantitative approaches to cultural activities; inconsistent data collection and dissemination; nebulous creative processes; lack of practical policy frameworks; and insufficient critical mass of advocates.

The authors argue that traditional economic frameworks inadequately capture creative activities, leading to systematic undervaluation of the sector's contributions. This invisibility perpetuates a cycle where creative work is undervalued, underfunded, and marginalized in development planning.

The Orange Ecosystem

The publication presents a comprehensive framework for understanding creative economy dynamics through three analytical perspectives: Orange Ecology (relationships between supply, demand, and institutional environment), Value Chain (transformation process from ideas to consumption), and Kreatopolis (the role of creative cities in fostering innovation).

The Orange Ecology model emphasizes three dimensions: Creation (supply side with artists, entrepreneurs, and companies), Engagement (demand side with consumers and prosumers), and Environment (institutional framework including regulation and governance). Intellectual property rights sit at the intersection of these three dimensions as a crucial enabling factor.

Digital Revolution and Technological Disruption

The authors position the Orange Economy within the context of the ongoing Digital Revolution, arguing that Latin America and the Caribbean must become early adopters rather than late followers. They identify six disruptive technologies with particular relevance to creative industries: mobile internet, knowledge work automation, internet of things, cloud technologies, advanced robotics, and 3D printing.

The demographic dividend presents a unique opportunity, with 107 million young people in Latin America and the Caribbean positioned to drive creative innovation. However, this requires shifting from commodity-dependent economic models toward knowledge-based development strategies that leverage creative and cultural assets.

The 7Is Framework for Policy Development

The document's policy recommendations are organized around seven "I" concepts:

Information: Addressing the fundamental data gaps through systematic mapping, statistics development, satellite accounts, indicators, and information systems. The authors advocate for continued expansion of cultural satellite accounts beyond the pioneering efforts in Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, and Uruguay.

Institutions: Transforming cultural institutions from traditional patronage models toward hybrid approaches that recognize both cultural and commercial dimensions. This requires overcoming false dichotomies between cultural and economic development while building trust among diverse stakeholders.

Industry: Developing balanced ecosystems that support the "triangle of innovation" connecting talent, entrepreneurs, and investors. The focus should be on creating sustainable environments rather than picking winners or creating industry champions.

Infrastructure: Emphasizing both physical and virtual connectivity as essential for creative innovation. The authors stress that creative activities thrive on access and exchange, requiring infrastructure that facilitates connections between audiences, content, artists, and technologies.

Integration: Promoting regional integration through the proposed MICO (Inter-American Market of Original Contents) involving seven areas of cooperation: co-nurturing, co-creation, co-production, co-distribution, co-consumption, co-protection, and co-investment.

Inclusion: Leveraging creative activities' proven capacity to regenerate social fabric, create employment opportunities with relatively low investment requirements, and bridge social divides through shared cultural experiences.

Inspiration: Creating environments that value risk-taking, celebrate experimentation, and provide the education, recognition, and infrastructure necessary for creative individuals to develop their talents and realize their potential.

Economic Data and Methodology

The study draws primarily from "The Economic Impact of the Creative Industries in the Americas" by Oxford Economics, commissioned by the Organization of American States, Inter-American Development Bank, and British Council. The methodology combines WIPO copyright-based industry studies with complementary national research to provide comprehensive regional analysis.

Key findings include significant productivity gaps between countries - creative workers in the United States are reportedly 14 times more productive than their Chinese counterparts, largely attributed to stronger intellectual property protection and enforcement. This highlights the critical importance of institutional frameworks in creative economy development.

Limitations and Critical Assessment

While the document provides valuable insights into creative economy development, several limitations warrant consideration. The heavy reliance on copyright-based definitions may undervalue informal creative activities and traditional cultural practices that don't fit conventional intellectual property frameworks. The focus on measurable economic outputs, while necessary for policy advocacy, risks overlooking the intrinsic cultural and social values that justify creative sector support.

The authors' optimistic projections about technology's transformative potential should be balanced against evidence of digital platforms' tendency toward market concentration and the challenges many creators face in monetizing their work in digital environments. The assumption that technological disruption automatically creates opportunities for creative entrepreneurs may underestimate the resources and skills required to compete in increasingly sophisticated global markets.

Relevance for Contemporary Policy

The document's framework remains relevant for policymakers seeking to develop creative economy strategies. The emphasis on comprehensive approaches addressing information gaps, institutional development, and infrastructure requirements provides practical guidance for government intervention. The regional integration agenda becomes particularly important as digital platforms enable cross-border collaboration while potentially undermining local creative ecosystems.

The "7Is" framework offers a structured approach to policy development that recognizes the creative economy's complexity while providing actionable recommendations. However, implementation requires adaptation to local contexts and recognition that creative industries operate differently across cultural, economic, and technological environments.

The publication's contribution lies in systematically articulating the economic case for creative sector investment while providing conceptual frameworks for understanding creative economy dynamics. For ASEAN contexts, the emphasis on regional integration, demographic dividends, and cultural heritage as economic assets offers particularly relevant insights, though the specific policy recommendations require adaptation to Southeast Asian political, economic, and cultural realities.