top of page
IMG_5940.jpg

ASEAN-KOREA

Cultural & Creative Sectors Research

The ASEAN Center of Excellence for Creative Industries(CoE)

  • Apr 1
  • 5 min read

Moving from Cultural Exchange to Economic Integration


1. Introduction: The Institutional Turn

The creative economy has historically been treated by ASEAN as a subset of Culture and Arts. However, under the Philippines' 2026 Chairmanship, the establishment of the ASEAN Center of Excellence (CoE) for Creative Industries represents a fundamental shift. It is the region's first dedicated institutional platform designed to harmonize the "Orange Economy" (creative sectors) with the "Digital Economy," transforming fragmented national industries into a unified regional powerhouse.


Formally designated as a Priority Economic Deliverable (PED) by the Philippine Department of Trade and Industry, the CoE will serve as a dynamic hub for policy dialogue, capacity-building, and cross-sectoral collaboration spanning digital media, film, music, design, and the broader creative industries.¹




2. Historical Genesis: From Discourse to Deliverable

The idea of a centralized ASEAN hub for creative industries did not appear in a vacuum. It is the result of a two-decade evolution:

  • 2004–2009 (The Conceptual Phase): Discussions first emerged in the mid-2000s as member states like Thailand (with its "Creative Thailand" policy) and Indonesia began advocating for creativity as an economic engine.

  • 2011 (The "Global Services Hub" Study): Early research by the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) identified creative services — including animation, design, and digital publishing — as critical sectors for regional integration under the AEC framework.²

  • 2020–2021 (The Pandemic Turning Point): The ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework (ACRF), adopted at the 37th ASEAN Summit in November 2020, identified the creative economy as a high-potential sector for post-pandemic resilience. Its Implementation Plan subsequently called for the establishment of an ASEAN Working Group on Creative Economy and formally proposed a centralized ASEAN Centre for Cultural and Creative Industries (ACCCI) as a cross-pillar platform.³

  • 2022 (The Siem Reap Declaration): Under Cambodia's Chairmanship, ASEAN adopted the Siem Reap Declaration on Promoting a Creative and Adaptive ASEAN Community to Support the Cultural and Creative Economy (July 7, 2022), providing the first ministerial mandate for a permanent creative economy framework.⁴

  • May 2025 (The Formal Adoption): Building on the Siem Reap Declaration and co-developed with UK support through the ASEAN–UK Advancing Creative Economy Programme, the ASEAN Creative Economy Sustainability Framework was adopted by Leaders at the 46th ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur on 26 May 2025. This framework provided the strategic "blueprint" for regional creative economy integration.⁵

  • 2026 (The "Brick and Mortar" Phase): The Philippines' Priority Economic Deliverable (PED) operationalizes the 2025 Framework through the formal establishment of the CoE — translating strategic vision into institutional infrastructure.¹


3. Comparative Analysis: How the ASEAN CoE Differs

To understand the CoE’s value, policy makers must distinguish it from existing international frameworks:

Feature

ASEAN CoE (ACE–CI)

UNESCO (UCCN)

APEC

Primary Goal

Economic Integration: Building a unified regional market and trade standards.

Cultural Diversity: Protecting heritage and promoting urban cultural identity.

Trade Liberalization: Reducing barriers for creative goods/services in the Pacific.

Scope

Regional (11 Member States, including Timor-Leste, admitted Oct. 2025).

Global (Individual Cities).

Trans-Pacific (21 Economies).

Mechanism

Direct Intervention: Standardizing IP laws, funding access, and workforce certification.

Networking: Sharing best practices between "Creative Cities" (e.g., Baguio, Bandung).

Policy Incubation: Issuing policy briefs and high-level trade recommendations.

Data Focus

Harmonizing regional metrics to track ASEAN-specific GVA.

Qualitative impact on sustainable urban development.

Broad trade data for global exports/imports.

Key Distinction: While UNESCO focuses on culture as a public good and APEC focuses on trade flows, the ASEAN CoE is an operational catalyst. It is designed to act as a "one-stop shop" for MSMEs to navigate regional regulations and access cross-border capital.


4. The Functional Pillars

The CoE is structured to address “market failures” that individual nations cannot solve alone:

A. IP Valuation & Harmonization

The greatest hurdle for regional creatives is the inability to use Intellectual Property (IP) as collateral for bank loans. The CoE will work with the ASEAN Working Group on Intellectual Property Cooperation (AWGIPC) to create a regional standard for IP valuation, allowing a Filipino animator or a Thai game developer to secure financing based on their intangible assets. DTI Undersecretary Allan B. Gepty has underscored this priority: “It is important that we unlock the financial value of ideas, inventions, designs and creative works. It is imperative that our stakeholders should see the value of their intangible assets.”¹

B. The "Hexa-Helix" Collaboration Model

Unlike traditional government-to-government bodies, the CoE utilizes a Hexa-Helix model integrating six actor categories:

  1. Government: Policy and regulation.

  2. Academia: Standardizing creative curriculum across ASEAN.

  3. Industry: Directing market needs.

  4. Civil Society: Ensuring inclusivity (Indigenous and local crafts).

  5. Media: Promoting the “Made in ASEAN” brand.

  6. Digital/Tech: Providing the infrastructure for distribution.

C. Regional Creative Workforce Certification

The CoE aims to establish a Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) for creative professionals. Modeled on existing MRAs for nurses and engineers, this would allow creative talent — graphic designers, sound engineers, animators — to have their skills recognized across all member states, facilitating a truly mobile regional workforce.


5. Strategic Outlook for 2026

As the Philippines leads the implementation through the Philippine Creative Industries Development Council, policy makers should prioritize three milestones:

  1. Finalizing the Secretariat Location: Establishing a permanent physical or hybrid headquarters to coordinate activities.

  2. The Digital Creative Registry: Launching a regional database of verified creative enterprises to facilitate B2B matching.

  3. Sustainability Funding: Moving beyond donor-dependency (e.g., the ASEAN–UK Advancing Creative Economy Programme) toward a self-sustaining model through public–private partnerships.


6. Conclusion

The ASEAN Center of Excellence for Creative Industries is not merely a cultural project; it is a structural economic intervention. By centralizing IP protection, data collection, and workforce standards, ASEAN signals readiness to move beyond being a consumer of global content to becoming a primary laboratory for "Oriental Creativity." According to UNCTAD data cited by SOMCA and the National Commission for Culture and the Arts (NCCA), the global creative economy generates over $2 trillion and accounts for nearly 50 million jobs — and Southeast Asia’s share is growing faster than traditional manufacturing.· The CoE represents ASEAN’s most ambitious institutional bet on that trajectory.

References

bottom of page